There is no question that Egypt now is not the Egypt of the 50's. Even my husband mourned the passing of the city that died with Nasser's changes, and he was born in the late 40's. But what is the same as in the past? It is the nature of life to change and one simply hopes for the best. I'm happy to see books from the refugees from Egypt because it will remind both the world and Egypt of the multiplicity of resources that Egypt had on hand. This was not a uni-cultural society at all. Egypt had layers upon layers of immigration and conquest and Cairo was the pearl whose brilliance came from the accumulations of cultures from the earliest times. Early Egyptians merged with Nubians, Sudanese, Hittites and others from the Fertile Crescent, Jews, Greeks, Persians, Romans, Arabs, Berbers, the multitude of cultures brought in under the Ottoman Turks from the Balkans and southern Russia, the Europeans who came and fell under Egypt's spell....Egypt has been the true melting pot but rather than losing their shape and flavour in the process, it's as though people come, leave something of their lustre and take on some of the glow of the preceding inhabitants, leaving Egypt and themselves richer in the process. It really doesn't surprise me at all that Cairo is so hard to leave.
Links:
New York Times review: www.nytimes.com/2007/08/10/books/10book
International Herald Tribune review: http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/08/09/arts/idside11.php
copyright 2007 Maryanne Stroud Gabbani